If a California-born individual now leads the CJNG, the issue extends beyond Mexico’s succession. It concerns the intersection of criminal power, cross-border identity, and state pressure in Latin America’s political landscape, both now and in the future.
A Borderless Criminal Inheritance
The notable aspect of this week’s report by The Wall Street Journal is not only that Juan Carlos Valencia Gonzalez, known as “03,” appears to lead one of Mexico’s most violent criminal organizations, but also that the potential successor is an American citizen, California-born, and remains deeply integrated within the familial and command structure of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel.
This issue extends beyond sensational headlines. In Latin America, cartels are often perceived as purely national entities, originating within a single state and exporting drugs, weapons, fear, and money. However, the evidence indicates a more complex and politically significant reality. A cartel leader may emerge from a cross-border existence, blended family ties, and the social and criminal intersections between Mexico and the United States. This does not negate the cartel’s Mexican origins but complicates and clarifies the regional context.
Valencia Gonzalez’s ascent was gradual. Following the capture of El Mencho’s biological son, Ruben Oseguera Gonzalez, in 2015, and his subsequent extradition and sentencing in the District of Columbia in March 2025, the opportunity arose. Among experts and intelligence communities in Mexico and the United States, “03” emerged as a plausible successor. The moniker reflects rank and proximity: “01” denoted El Mencho, “02” his son, and “03” was sufficiently close to power to make succession conceivable.
Nevertheless, the reports exercise caution where public discourse often lacks it. Confirming Valencia Gonzalez as the definitive leader remains challenging. The CJNG does not operate under a singular leadership model; rather, it functions through a criminal council comprising multiple leaders. This uncertainty is central to the political implications of the situation.
If a cartel of this magnitude depends on a single leader, then a leadership transition becomes a targeted pursuit. Conversely, if power is distributed, the organization becomes more resilient to decapitation and better able to withstand external pressures. This distinction is critical for Latin America, as it influences state strategies, public perceptions of control, and the longevity of this violent criminal power.
The CJNG is not a localized entity. The reports identify strongholds in Jalisco, Nayarit, and Colima, with operations extending throughout Mexico and internationally, including trafficking to the United States, Australia, Canada, and countries in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, and Europe. Its effective control of the Port of Manzanillo facilitates the importation of precursor chemicals for fentanyl and methamphetamine production. The organization also profits from extortion, fuel theft, kidnapping, illegal logging and mining, migrant smuggling, and timeshare fraud. In essence, it functions not merely as a cartel but as a violent economic system.
Implications of Succession for the Region
At this point, the political significance of Latin America becomes clearer. If Valencia Gonzalez is the effective leader, one interpretation offered is pragmatically somber. The country may have avoided a more violent outcome. Alternative candidates in the succession struggle are described as instigators of violence, connected to forced recruitment, torture camps, or military-style confrontations. Thus, a less overtly warlike leader does not signify peace but may indicate a different intensity of violence.
This situation does not provide reassurance; rather, it represents crisis management.
The reports distinguish between a political, negotiating faction within the cartel and a shock group composed of military figures who rely exclusively on violence. This division is notable as it reflects political sociology rather than mere criminal disorder. It indicates an organizational structure capable of calibrating violence, negotiating strategically, and escalating force when provoked. Latin America has previously encountered similar dynamics, where armed groups not only confront the state but also emulate aspects of its functions.
Mexican authorities also identify Valencia Gonzalez as the primary leader of the Grupo de Elite, a violent armed faction characterized by substantial firepower and military training. Thus, even the more moderate interpretation has limitations. While he may be preferable to more violent rivals, he remains part of an apparatus founded on coercion, public executions, disappearances, assassinations, intimidation through media, and attacks on judges, politicians, law enforcement officers, and civilians. The reports preclude any romanticized perceptions.
The reports raise a sober political question. If leadership remains collective, the CJNG may maintain internal balance and distribute risk. However, if a single individual, particularly an American citizen, is identified as a leader, he becomes a primary target for authorities in both Mexico and the United States. One expert perspective suggests that automatic elevation would be strategically unwise for “03,” as it would focus attention on him rather than dispersing capture efforts among multiple individuals. This reasoning is plausible, as criminal power endures through both brutality and ambiguity.
For Latin America, this represents a profound warning. The region faces not only violent groups but also governance models within criminal organizations capable of absorbing succession shocks and continuing operations.
Pressure Intensifies in Two Directions
The United States has escalated its approach. According to the reports, the State Department designated the CJNG as a foreign terrorist organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist entity in February 2025. Subsequently, Treasury sanctions were imposed in June 2025 on senior figures, including Audias Flores Silva and Hugo Mendoza Gaytan. These measures have practical implications in finance, diplomacy, and intelligence cooperation, as well as symbolic significance.
If an American citizen is perceived to lead the CJNG following El Mencho’s death, the narrative becomes more complex for both countries to confine within traditional political frameworks. For Mexico, this underscores that cartel power is not an isolated domestic issue but is intertwined with the United States, which consumes drugs, prosecutes traffickers, imposes sanctions, and remains central to the cartel’s economic activities. For the United States, it complicates the portrayal of the threat as purely external when a prominent figure may be a citizen.
This tension will resonate throughout Latin America. Regional governments already contend with the spillover of trafficking routes, money laundering, migrant smuggling, and armed networks that disregard borders. According to the reports, the CJNG has expanded across Mexico since 2018 and, as of 2025, is the primary competitor to the Sinaloa Cartel. A succession struggle within such an organization is not solely a Mexican issue; it alters incentives across trade, violence, and corruption corridors, affecting much of the hemisphere.
An additional factor intensifies the gravity of this moment. The reports mention the discovery of the remains of hundreds of CJNG recruits by activists at the Izaguirre Ranch in Jalisco. This detail underlies all others with stark reality. Beyond the analysis, security terminology, and leadership mappings, there exist bodies, camps, disappeared civilians, public executions, and communities compelled to cooperate silently.
Therefore, the implications for Latin America are concrete. The region is observing a criminal superstructure testing its capacity to endure another leadership transition, sanction, and period of scrutiny. It demonstrates that borders remain ineffective as moral explanations. Furthermore, the presence of an American citizen near the leadership of one of the hemisphere’s most violent cartels challenges the outdated notion of separate worlds.
Also Read:
Mexican Death in ICE Custody Haunts Latin America’s Fragile Diaspora
