Blog

In Alamar, an eighteen-story building has learned to listen for silence. When the power cuts, an elevator can become a small metal room filled with strangers. The oil squeeze, fragile plants, and inflation turn outages into policy.

The Elevator Door That Never Really Closes

“Is anyone trapped in the elevatooor?” Heidi Martínez calls out, her phone held high like a lantern, the light bouncing off concrete and metal.

She is the administrator of an eighteen-story apartment building in Alamar, on the outskirts of Havana. She is fifty-three. Not a technician, not a mechanic, not someone trained for this. But necessity is an aggressive teacher, and she has become practiced at manually opening the elevator when it stalls.

It happens several times a week. A neighbor gets stuck. The building loses power. The elevator stops between floors. And Martínez, with her phone light and her hands, becomes the difference between panic and air again.

“We’ve already developed a culture of blackouts,” she told EFE, standing at the building entrance.

In Cuba, the daily electricity cuts, driven by a power generation deficit, have been chronic for years. In places like Alamar, they are a familiar burden. The trouble is that in recent weeks they have intensified into something harder to bear, with between fifteen and twenty hours a day without power across the country, as noted in the notes, tied to Washington’s oil pressure on the island.

Official data describe Tuesday as the most extensive blackout on record. At peak demand in the afternoon and night, more than sixty-four percent of the country was simultaneously without electricity.

Alamar carries its own particular version of this nightmare, and Martínez names it the way people name a recurring illness. They call it quita y pon, she explains, repeated cuts with no discernible pattern that can stretch for hours, every day. In a neighborhood of around 100,000 residents, unpredictability is not a detail. It is the whole point.

If a blackout arrives, you prepare. If it arrives like a flicker, you live in a constant state of half-readiness.

Martínez’s elevator is the sharpest illustration. You can hear it in her voice when she shouts into the shaft, a sound that mixes duty with worry. A building can be tall. It can be ordinary. And still, with the wrong kind of darkness, it becomes a trap.

Quita y Pon as a Way of Life

Out front, in the improvised workshop near the building’s garages, Erleny is repairing a tire camera. He is forty-nine, working with his hands in a place that looks like it was assembled from what was available, because that is often how workspaces are built when supplies are scarce.

He describes the power cuts the way you describe a bad habit that refuses to be trained out of the body. “It can be twenty minutes, it can be half an hour, it can be an hour. Nobody adapts to that. That’s like, well, what remedy?” he told EFE.

That sense of resignation is not passive. It is active endurance. It is people building their day around the possibility that the lights will fail in the middle of a task, and then return, and then fail again.

Gladys Berriel, a retired special education teacher of seventy-four, says the problem began in twenty twenty three and stayed. There is no surprise in how she tells it. The phrasing carries the tired certainty of someone who has watched an emergency become routine.

The frustration is so deep, she adds, that some neighbors would trade the quita y pon for the longer, scheduled blackouts other regions endure. It sounds backward until you sit with it for a moment. Predictability is a kind of dignity. A schedule means you can plan dinner, charge a phone, store food, time a shower, and manage a medication.

“If at least we had a schedule, because we understand the situation with fuel perfectly, you adjust,” Martínez said.

What this reveals is a social contract that people are still trying to honor, even as it frays. Many residents are not denying the crisis. They are asking for the most basic courtesy a system can offer in a shortage: tell us when.

When Repairs Cost More Than Work Ever Paid

The elevator scares you, but the real damage spreads quietly through appliances and budgets.

The quita y pon, this irregular pulsing of electricity, burns through household electronics without mercy. And in a country marked by product scarcity and high inflation, replacing or repairing a refrigerator or a fan is not an inconvenience. It is a crisis that sits atop the larger crisis.

Berriel says repairing her refrigerator costs more than her pension. She paid five thousand pesos for the repair, she told EFE. Her retirement income, she added, is 3,156 pesos after 37 years of working in education.

Numbers like that do not just describe a personal hardship. They describe a society where the math no longer works, where the cost of keeping food cold can exceed the monthly reward for a lifetime of public work.

This is where the story stops being only about electricity and becomes about how people are forced to ration everything at once. Light. Food. Time. Sleep. Money. Calm.

The notes frame the latest surge in blackouts as part of a broader energy crisis worsened by the United States oil pressure, layered onto an already critical situation. Cuba has faced prolonged daily outages since the summer of twenty twenty four, as the text ties them to frequent breakdowns at obsolete thermoelectric plants and a lack of foreign currency to import crude.

Since January 9, the notes say, no external fuel has entered Cuba, while the island produces only about a third of its energy needs. The government announced a contingency package last week aimed at surviving without imported oil: hospitals, state offices, and public transport operating at minimum service, universities shifting to remote teaching, cultural and scientific events canceled, and severe fuel rationing.

Independent experts cited in the notes believe that, between February and March, the lack of fuel will begin to hit Cuba severely, as it is indispensable and its absence cuts across every sector.

In recent days, the notes add, several countries have announced humanitarian aid shipments. The U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights said Friday that the United States is violating the U.N. Charter and international law with the oil pressure.

Back in Alamar, the policy arguments are real. Still, they arrive through a narrower door: the sound of an elevator stopping, the sudden quiet of a fan, the jolt that kills a refrigerator, the small flashlight beam of a phone in a stairwell.

Martínez listens, then calls out again. Is anyone trapped? The question is practical. It is also a summary of the moment Cuba is living through.

Also Read:
Chile Border Politics Harden as Kast Countdown Haunts Northern Highlands

In Venezuela, a delayed amnesty vote collided with a country that no longer waits patiently. Outside a police command in eastern Caracas, relatives linked themselves in chains. They turned a sidewalk into a deadline, pressing Parliament and the state to choose words or freedom.

Chains on the Sidewalk, Law in the Chamber

By late day in eastern Caracas, the protest had a stubborn, metallic sound. Chains scraped against the ground as relatives tightened links around their waists and wrists outside the Bolivarian National Police command known as Zona 7. People shifted their weight. They watched the doors. They listened for movement inside a building that holds the people they call political prisoners.

Yessy Orozco, the daughter of former lawmaker Fernando Orozco, said the families would remain chained outside until everyone held in that facility is released. “Here we are going to remain chained, nobody enters, nobody leaves, unless they free our political prisoners, until the last of our political prisoners leaves this penitentiary center,” she told EFE.

The trouble is that the promise they thought they heard from the National Assembly has now been pushed into next week.

Earlier Thursday, lawmakers in Venezuela’s National Assembly postponed the second and final debate required to approve an amnesty bill covering cases of political prisoners since 1999. The session moved forward, but only up to Article Six of the proposed Law of Amnesty for Democratic Coexistence. Then it snagged on Article Seven, the clause that demands something the opposition says turns amnesty into accusation.

On paper, the bill aims to grant what it calls a general and full amnesty for crimes or infractions committed during the events and time frame outlined in the text, with the stated purpose of promoting social peace and democratic coexistence. It is a language of reconciliation, almost ceremonial. But the practical hinge is whether people who might be prosecuted or convicted must appear before the justice system to benefit from that amnesty.

Article Seven says the amnesty applies to anyone who is or could be prosecuted or convicted for alleged or proven participation in crimes or infractions committed, as long as that person is in good standing before the law or places themselves in good standing after the law takes effect.

Opposition lawmaker Luis Florido of the Libertad faction argued the article had to be modified because requiring people to present themselves before the justice system already casts them as guilty if they are under judicial proceedings. Chavismo lawmakers responded that the Constitution establishes that people must be present in a criminal process.

In the end, both sides asked to postpone. The next session is expected next Thursday, after the Carnival holiday.

For families outside Zona 7, the delay is not procedural. It is personal. It is another week.

Orozco said that last Friday, National Assembly president Jorge Rodríguez said the bill would be approved this week and that afterward all political prisoners would be released. Petra Vera, a relative of another detainee at Zona 7, demanded Rodríguez keep that promise. “We are protesting because of the mockery that all the families of the political prisoners in this penitentiary center have been subjected to; we consider it a mockery,” she told EFE.

The wager here is that public pressure can force a schedule to mean something.

A Single Article That Changes Everything

Inside the Assembly, the debate turned into a fight over what it means to be “at the disposal” of a justice system and what it means to return to it, especially for people the opposition frames as persecuted and the government frames as defendants.

This is not a minor legal edit. It is the difference between a law that functions as a release mechanism and one that functions as a filter.

Florido’s argument is blunt: if someone is asked to present themselves before the courts, the state is already signaling that person as responsible. The chavista answer is also blunt: due process requires presence, and the Constitution matters.

Both claims can be true in the abstract. The trouble is the lived reality around them. A country does not argue about amnesty in a vacuum. It argues about it with jail cells in mind, with police commands that become symbols, and with relatives who can recite promises because they have learned to measure politics in calendar weeks.

What this does is place the entire bill under the shadow of one phrase, “to place oneself in good standing,” and the political question beneath it, who gets to decide what good standing looks like.

The bill’s supporters say it seeks to promote peace and coexistence. Its skeptics look at the requirement to show up and hear something else: a new condition attached to freedom, a new administrative gate.

So the Assembly approved up to Article Six, then stopped. The chamber did not break because it ran out of time. It broke because the seventh point marks the point where policy becomes consequence.

Youth in the Streets, Promises Under Pressure

The postponement did not keep the opposition quiet. Thursday was the National Youth Day, and the Venezuelan Student Movement returned to the streets in multiple cities, demanding the release of all political prisoners. It was one of the largest opposition mobilizations in more than a year.

In Caracas, hundreds gathered at the Central University of Venezuela, the country’s principal university, moving within and outside the campus. Their chant was simple and designed for echo: “Not one, not two, all of them,” a response to the release process that began January 8.

According to the NGO Foro Penal, 431 releases had been verified through February 10, while it estimates that more than 600 remain imprisoned. The numbers hang over everything. They create a sense of movement, but also of unfinished business.

Miguel Ángel Suárez, president of the Federation of University Centers at the Central University of Venezuela, said they would keep pressuring “until all civil and political rights are restored,” and called for an end to persecution and for guarantees that would lead the country to a democratic transition.

In Maracaibo, students from the University of Zulia also marched, demanding inclusion in the amnesty debate. Yeissel Pérez, president of the university’s student federation, criticized the fact that youth leadership was not called to the public consultation on the bill. This process did include academics, NGOs, and relatives of political prisoners.

Seen together, the scenes form a single argument made in different locations. Students demand inclusion in the terms of the law. Families demand results from the law. Lawmakers debate whether the law requires deference to courts that many protesters distrust. And the state, still controlled by chavismo in Parliament, insists procedure is not optional.

On the sidewalk outside Zona 7, chains hold steady. Not one, not two. All of them. Repetition becomes a strategy when faith in timelines runs out.

Also Read:
Colombia Tiger Candidate Turns Homeland Theater into a Presidential Test